Commercial Real Estate Climate Strategies: Managing the Risks
-
bookmark
-
print
- Keywords:
- sustainable real estate
The best way to think of a climate strategy in the commercial real estate industry is that it is part of a business strategy. It concerns many stakeholders, including executive leadership, investors, and users/tenants, and will account for physical and compliance risks that have an impact on the industry’s assets and valuations.
In this way, a climate strategy is not a nice to have, but rather a necessary part of doing business that more companies are implementing.
In this second article of our two-part series on the evolving regulatory response to climate change in the commercial real estate industry, we examine how owners and managers can consider and benefit from the climate-related risks that are driving the segment to action, including:
-
Taking action to protect against weather-related property damage, which is becoming increasingly common.
-
Staying attuned to the evolving landscape of Building Performance Standards being imposed by a growing number of jurisdictions.
-
Considering the technology that can be implemented at the time of capital renewal.
Managing the risks of climate extremes
Increasingly unpredictable weather extremes are impacting the built environment, which was largely constructed to tolerate a range of conditions that are no longer the norm. That’s why making buildings more resilient to changing weather patterns is a smart investment.
Weather-related insured damages surpassed CA$3 billion annually in Canada in both 2022 and 2023,1 and US$93 billion in the U.S. in 2023,2 most of which was associated with damage to buildings.
By 2050, projections show that up to US$160 billion in U.S. real estate assets could be impacted by rising sea levels, climbing to between US$238 billion and US$507 billion by 2100.3 In Canada, projected damages from rising sea levels could reach CA$1.2 billion annually by the end of the century.4
A changing climate can also disrupt supply chains for property owners and tenants, reduce labor productivity, erode property value and increase energy costs, all of which can exacerbate cash flow volatility for real estate businesses and tenants.
Proactive investment in climate adaptation has been shown to deliver a return of investment of 2x to 10x when taking the cost of avoided future damages into consideration. Even taking simple actions for flood resilience can lead to favorable insurance premiums for climate-resilient buildings, higher occupancy rates, reduced cash flow volatility for property owners and tenants, and reduced energy costs.5
Business implications:
Commercial property owners can benefit from conducting risk assessments that consider the exposure of the properties in your portfolios to climate hazards, including floods, wildfires, extreme heat, storms and water access.
From there, you can gain insights into how these factors are expected to evolve over the lifetime of your buildings, as well as the associated impact on property values and cash flow. Industry participants can gain deeper insights from extending this analysis to the risks posed to corporate supply chains and tenants’ value chains and partnering to reduce risk.
Navigating an evolving regulatory roadmap
Local governments across North America are introducing regulations that will have a significant impact on commercial building owners and operators. Cities in Canada and the U.S., as well as globally, are setting net-zero targets aligned with, or more ambitious than, federal targets, and they’re implementing building performance standards (BPS) to drive compliance.
The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy finds that “the number of jurisdictions implementing BPS has doubled since 2020,” with three states and 11 U.S. cities implementing some type of BPS.6 Major Canadian real estate markets, including Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal, are doing so as well. These standards typically require increased measurement and reporting of emissions for commercial buildings along with emission reduction targets that become increasingly strict over time.
Business implications:
Building owners can benefit from establishing a view of BPS policies across their real estate portfolio, identifying where emissions are within their value chains, and developing an implementation plan aligned with capital renewal cycles.
Based on the BPS policies that apply, property owners can set targets for several key indicators, including:
-
Energy efficiency and emission reductions
-
Embodied carbon
-
Renewable energy procurement
-
Carbon offsets
-
Climate resilience measures
-
Workforce upskilling
In addition, when municipalities implement BPS targets, they typically provide guidance and tools to help property owners achieve compliance. These jurisdictions are also more likely to provide financing solutions to support property owners in their decarbonization journeys. Additional resources to help in measurement and benchmarking include the GHG Protocol's Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard and Energy Star’s benchmarking tool.
Turning intention into action
Implementing a climate strategy is frankly complex and it will take time. Fortunately, the key technologies required to cut emissions from the building sector exist today and adoption can be accelerated with suitable financing structures, market demand, and supply of clean power. The primary strategies and associated technologies are:
-
Reducing overall energy demand through enhancement to the building envelope, optimizing internal energy-consuming systems (e.g., lighting, equipment), and integration of smart systems to control energy use.
-
Decarbonizing the energy consumed in buildings through the electrification of space and water heating. This is primarily achieved with heat pumps, installation of onsite renewable energy systems, and incorporation of non-emitting gases (hydrogen, renewable natural gas) into existing infrastructure where electrification is not feasible.
In addition to using the right tools, understanding the rapidly evolving regulatory landscape will require owners and developers to find the right partners who can help them access the resources and information they need to minimize their compliance risk.
Whether it is the consequences of rising sea levels or navigating an ever-evolving regulatory environment, managing the emerging risks to your operations, customers and supply chains is an important step toward ensuring business strategies are positioned for continued success.
1 Severe weather in 2023 caused over $3.1 billion in insured damage. (n.d.-b).
2 2023: A historic year of U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters. (2024b, January 8). NOAA Climate.gov.
3 Becketti, Sean. (2021). The Impact of Climate Change on Housing and Housing Finance. Research Institute for Housing America.
4 Institut climatique du Canada. (2022, July 27). Under water - Canadian Climate Institute. Canadian Climate Institute.
5 Report outlines measures to protect commercial real estate owners. (2021, January 13). Waterloo News.
6 Nadel, S., Hinge, A. (2023). Mandatory Building Performance Standards: A Key Policy for Achieving Climate Goals. ACEEE.
George Sutherland
Senior Advisor, Climate Change & Sustainability
View Full Profile
The best way to think of a climate strategy in the commercial real estate industry is that it is part of a business strategy. It concerns many stakeholders, including executive leadership, investors, and users/tenants, and will account for physical and compliance risks that have an impact on the industry’s assets and valuations.
In this way, a climate strategy is not a nice to have, but rather a necessary part of doing business that more companies are implementing.
In this second article of our two-part series on the evolving regulatory response to climate change in the commercial real estate industry, we examine how owners and managers can consider and benefit from the climate-related risks that are driving the segment to action, including:
-
Taking action to protect against weather-related property damage, which is becoming increasingly common.
-
Staying attuned to the evolving landscape of Building Performance Standards being imposed by a growing number of jurisdictions.
-
Considering the technology that can be implemented at the time of capital renewal.
Managing the risks of climate extremes
Increasingly unpredictable weather extremes are impacting the built environment, which was largely constructed to tolerate a range of conditions that are no longer the norm. That’s why making buildings more resilient to changing weather patterns is a smart investment.
Weather-related insured damages surpassed CA$3 billion annually in Canada in both 2022 and 2023,1 and US$93 billion in the U.S. in 2023,2 most of which was associated with damage to buildings.
By 2050, projections show that up to US$160 billion in U.S. real estate assets could be impacted by rising sea levels, climbing to between US$238 billion and US$507 billion by 2100.3 In Canada, projected damages from rising sea levels could reach CA$1.2 billion annually by the end of the century.4
A changing climate can also disrupt supply chains for property owners and tenants, reduce labor productivity, erode property value and increase energy costs, all of which can exacerbate cash flow volatility for real estate businesses and tenants.
Proactive investment in climate adaptation has been shown to deliver a return of investment of 2x to 10x when taking the cost of avoided future damages into consideration. Even taking simple actions for flood resilience can lead to favorable insurance premiums for climate-resilient buildings, higher occupancy rates, reduced cash flow volatility for property owners and tenants, and reduced energy costs.5
Business implications:
Commercial property owners can benefit from conducting risk assessments that consider the exposure of the properties in your portfolios to climate hazards, including floods, wildfires, extreme heat, storms and water access.
From there, you can gain insights into how these factors are expected to evolve over the lifetime of your buildings, as well as the associated impact on property values and cash flow. Industry participants can gain deeper insights from extending this analysis to the risks posed to corporate supply chains and tenants’ value chains and partnering to reduce risk.
Navigating an evolving regulatory roadmap
Local governments across North America are introducing regulations that will have a significant impact on commercial building owners and operators. Cities in Canada and the U.S., as well as globally, are setting net-zero targets aligned with, or more ambitious than, federal targets, and they’re implementing building performance standards (BPS) to drive compliance.
The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy finds that “the number of jurisdictions implementing BPS has doubled since 2020,” with three states and 11 U.S. cities implementing some type of BPS.6 Major Canadian real estate markets, including Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal, are doing so as well. These standards typically require increased measurement and reporting of emissions for commercial buildings along with emission reduction targets that become increasingly strict over time.
Business implications:
Building owners can benefit from establishing a view of BPS policies across their real estate portfolio, identifying where emissions are within their value chains, and developing an implementation plan aligned with capital renewal cycles.
Based on the BPS policies that apply, property owners can set targets for several key indicators, including:
-
Energy efficiency and emission reductions
-
Embodied carbon
-
Renewable energy procurement
-
Carbon offsets
-
Climate resilience measures
-
Workforce upskilling
In addition, when municipalities implement BPS targets, they typically provide guidance and tools to help property owners achieve compliance. These jurisdictions are also more likely to provide financing solutions to support property owners in their decarbonization journeys. Additional resources to help in measurement and benchmarking include the GHG Protocol's Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard and Energy Star’s benchmarking tool.
Turning intention into action
Implementing a climate strategy is frankly complex and it will take time. Fortunately, the key technologies required to cut emissions from the building sector exist today and adoption can be accelerated with suitable financing structures, market demand, and supply of clean power. The primary strategies and associated technologies are:
-
Reducing overall energy demand through enhancement to the building envelope, optimizing internal energy-consuming systems (e.g., lighting, equipment), and integration of smart systems to control energy use.
-
Decarbonizing the energy consumed in buildings through the electrification of space and water heating. This is primarily achieved with heat pumps, installation of onsite renewable energy systems, and incorporation of non-emitting gases (hydrogen, renewable natural gas) into existing infrastructure where electrification is not feasible.
In addition to using the right tools, understanding the rapidly evolving regulatory landscape will require owners and developers to find the right partners who can help them access the resources and information they need to minimize their compliance risk.
Whether it is the consequences of rising sea levels or navigating an ever-evolving regulatory environment, managing the emerging risks to your operations, customers and supply chains is an important step toward ensuring business strategies are positioned for continued success.
1 Severe weather in 2023 caused over $3.1 billion in insured damage. (n.d.-b).
2 2023: A historic year of U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters. (2024b, January 8). NOAA Climate.gov.
3 Becketti, Sean. (2021). The Impact of Climate Change on Housing and Housing Finance. Research Institute for Housing America.
4 Institut climatique du Canada. (2022, July 27). Under water - Canadian Climate Institute. Canadian Climate Institute.
5 Report outlines measures to protect commercial real estate owners. (2021, January 13). Waterloo News.
6 Nadel, S., Hinge, A. (2023). Mandatory Building Performance Standards: A Key Policy for Achieving Climate Goals. ACEEE.
Commercial Real Estate Climate Strategies
PART 1
Commercial Real Estate Climate Strategies: Exploring Opportunities
George Sutherland | September 13, 2024 | Commercial Real Estate
In many ways, the timing could not be better for North American commercial real estate owners and developers to make climate change strategies a busi…
Related Insights
Tell us three simple things to
customize your experience
Banking products are subject to approval and are provided in Canada by Bank of Montreal, a CDIC Member.
BMO Commercial Bank is a trade name used in Canada by Bank of Montreal, a CDIC member.
Please note important disclosures for content produced by BMO Capital Markets. BMO Capital Markets Regulatory | BMOCMC Fixed Income Commentary Disclosure | BMOCMC FICC Macro Strategy Commentary Disclosure | Research Disclosure Statements
BMO Capital Markets is a trade name used by BMO Financial Group for the wholesale banking businesses of Bank of Montreal, BMO Bank N.A. (member FDIC), Bank of Montreal Europe p.l.c., and Bank of Montreal (China) Co. Ltd, the institutional broker dealer business of BMO Capital Markets Corp. (Member FINRA and SIPC) and the agency broker dealer business of Clearpool Execution Services, LLC (Member FINRA and SIPC) in the U.S. , and the institutional broker dealer businesses of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. (Member Canadian Investment Regulatory Organization and Member Canadian Investor Protection Fund) in Canada and Asia, Bank of Montreal Europe p.l.c. (authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland) in Europe and BMO Capital Markets Limited (authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority) in the UK and Australia and carbon credit origination, sustainability advisory services and environmental solutions provided by Bank of Montreal, BMO Radicle Inc., and Carbon Farmers Australia Pty Ltd. (ACN 136 799 221 AFSL 430135) in Australia. "Nesbitt Burns" is a registered trademark of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc, used under license. "BMO Capital Markets" is a trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under license. "BMO (M-Bar roundel symbol)" is a registered trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under license.
® Registered trademark of Bank of Montreal in the United States, Canada and elsewhere.
™ Trademark of Bank of Montreal in the United States and Canada.
The material contained in articles posted on this website is intended as a general market commentary. The opinions, estimates and projections, if any, contained in these articles are those of the authors and may differ from those of other BMO Commercial Bank employees and affiliates. BMO Commercial Bank endeavors to ensure that the contents have been compiled or derived from sources that it believes to be reliable and which it believes contain information and opinions which are accurate and complete. However, the authors and BMO Commercial Bank take no responsibility for any errors or omissions and do not guarantee their accuracy or completeness. These articles are for informational purposes only.
Bank of Montreal and its affiliates do not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. This material has been prepared for informational purposes only, and is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, tax, legal or accounting advice. You should consult your own tax, legal and accounting advisors before engaging in any transaction.
Third party web sites may have privacy and security policies different from BMO. Links to other web sites do not imply the endorsement or approval of such web sites. Please review the privacy and security policies of web sites reached through links from BMO web sites.
Please note important disclosures for content produced by BMO Capital Markets. BMO Capital Markets Regulatory | BMOCMC Fixed Income Commentary Disclosure | BMOCMC FICC Macro Strategy Commentary Disclosure | Research Disclosure Statements